News

the-lings-ineos
Chemicals giant and fracking company INEOS has identified a potential shale gas drilling site in the ‘Heart of Sherwood Forest’, Friends of the Earth can reveal.
 
A fresh set of correspondence between INEOS’s land surveyors and the Forestry Commission, obtained by Friends of the Earth using Freedom of Information requests, reveals that they plan to put at least one drilling rig in The Lings, on the western edge of Sherwood Forest.
 
In an email dated 22 November 2016, INEOS’ land surveyors Fisher German Priestner wrote to the Forestry Commission concerning a “Proposed Well Site – The Lings at Clipstone”. The correspondence also contains maps showing a proposed well site in The Lings – at a spot just 500m from the Thynghowe, an ancient Viking assembly site deemed to be of international significance.
 
These woods lie within the boundary of the proposed Sherwood Forest Regional Park in an area identified as ‘The Heart of the Forest’; are well within the historic extent of Sherwood Forest; and are labelled as being part of Sherwood Forest on Ordnance Survey maps.
 
Local resident and member of Frack Free Sherwood, Deb Hodson, said:
“Our beautiful historic woodland is the home to many ancient oaks, many species of wildlife and fauna. It is also a place of historic significance not only with its links to King John but also an important Danelaw meeting place. Our concerns around fracking in this area have been confirmed by INEOS themselves.”
 
“My hope is that now the general public can see the constant discrepancies that are being put forward by INEOS, they will research for themselves how this will affect our community.” 
prom dresses

2 comments

  1. Clare Willis-Burton - February 16, 2017 10:45 am

    We do not want fracking anywhere, the people have overwelming said a big fat NO. Please do your research into the many harms of fracking so you can make an honest and right decision. Once you allow them to take and pollute our water, there is no going back. Please think of future generations

    Reply
  2. Emma - February 16, 2017 1:35 pm

    Errr no thanks. The risks are just to high then there’s the fact it should be protected due to what it is. Disgusting

    Reply

Have your say