14th License Round New Licenses: Sherwood Forest

Licences have been awarded in Nottinghamshire which could potentially see fracking for shale gas.

The main areas of concern are The Widmerpool Trough and Sherwood Forest.

Sherwood Forest

gainsborough-trough

Most of Sherwood Forest could be fracked for shale gas if the government gets its way. On 18 August, a consultation was launched on nine potential blocks around the Sherwood Forest area, most of which are on the Southern edge of the Gainsborough Trough (the orange area shows where the British Geological Survey says there could be shale gas, lilac indicates a double layer of shale gas)

Each of the licence blocks is defined by a 10km square. The government has produced an interactive map showing the shale gas area in relation to licence blocks. Blocks in the potential shale gas area include:
  • SK67a (Clumber Park)
  • SK66b (area around Major Oak, Sherwood Pines and Ollerton)
  • SK66c (Eakring)
  • SK57c (Creswell – Welbeck)
  • SK56i (Clipstone – Market Warsop)
  • SK47b (N of Bolsover)
  • SK46c (around Hardwick Hall)
Blocks outside the shale gas area:
  • SK55 (Newstead Abbey – Thieves Wood)
  • SK76b (between Tuxford and Caunton)
These blocks are subject to consultation because they are within 10km of a European-listed wildlife site – either the Birklands & Bilhaugh Special Area of Conservation (ancient woodland around the Major Oak) or the South Pennine Moors Special Protection Area.
In each case the government recommendation is to license all of these blocks to allow fracking anywhere except actually in Birklands & Bilhaugh SAC. Fracking would be allowed under this area.
(See extract from the government recommendations – which suggest no conditions for any of the licences except SK66b, claiming no AEOI (adverse effect on the integrity of European sites). Activities are divided into A (non-intrusive exploration including seismic testing which would be allowed even in the ancient woodland area), B (exploration drilling), C (well development), D (production). B, C and D could include fracking and would be prohibited ‘at or near to the surface within the boundaries’ of the Birklands and Bilhaugh SAC, but would be licensed without conditions everywhere else in these blocks around Sherwood Forest.)
The Sherwood Forest area centred on Ollerton is already the earthquake capital of Britain as a result of previous coal mining. The sandstone which creates the Sherwood Forest habitat running down the centre of Notts is also a major source of groundwater. It is not clear what, if any, consideration has been given to these issues in the government’s ‘Appropriate Assessment’. The government has previously said that only the immediate zone around water abstraction points (SPZ1) should be protected from fracking, and not the whole groundwater zone (SPZ3) – see Impact Assessment for Onshore Hydraulic Fracturing (Protected Areas) Regulations.
It also seems that no consideration has been given to other wildlife sites. Greenpeace has a map showing Sites of Special Scientific Interest which are in the proposed licence blocks. Friends of the Earth’s ‘frackingmap‘ shows groundwater source protection zones. It should be said that fracking companies will have to get planning permission and an environmental permit as well as a licence, when further consideration will have to be given to environmental protection. It is clear that the government wants to allow fracking almost everywhere across Sherwood Forest. Will the Notts Planning Committee and the Environment Agency agree?
The government is consulting on 132 proposed licence blocks in all. Comments are invited by 29 September.

1 comment

  1. Jennifer Skelton - June 8, 2016 4:42 pm

    Australia has been learning the lessons the hard way regarding fracking. Is this what we want to have to experience in our small densely populated land mass ? I sincerely hope not the devastation caused by fracking to the land and the rivers, the impact on the health and wellbeing of people living in close proximity to fracking wells says it all. We in Britain cannot risk this happening here.
    There is so much evidence from reputable scientists and others which demonstrates the dangers of fracking. Why would any responsible person make such a choice for themselves, theiir families and their communities? To voluntarily drain acquifers, to poison water with fracking chemicals as well as to destroy a precious and irreplaceable environment is highly suspect to say the very least.
    The outcome will speak for itself.

    Reply

Have your say